Grow Waitaha Roadshow

Led by Nicole (Rāwhiti) and Rachael (Wigram)

bit.ly/continuumchoice by Barbara Bray and Kathleen McClusky (check this website).

Continuum of Choice TM

Providing choice can be confusing. If learners are choosing from a set of pre-planned choices from a computer program or a list of options from the teacher, then the teacher is ultimately the one responsible for the learning not the learner. As learners increase responsibility around voice, teachers can also provide a process that builds ownership as learners move toward agency with choice. 

Participant 

The teacher or a computer program provides a menu of options for learners. These options are choices for learners to learn content through images, videos, text-based resources, audio, hands-on activities, or interactions with peers. These options allow learners to access information, engage with content, and express what they know and understand. The choices offered provide learners opportunities to showcase what they know from writing a paper to creating a performance.

Co-Designer

The teacher provides learning possibilities and then gets out of the way for learners to go on their own journey (via Jackie Gerstein). They invite input from learners to add to options of choices on how they would prefer or need to access information, engage with content, and express what they know. The teacher collaborates with the learner to brainstorm ideas for lesson design, assessment strategies and types of tools and resources to use with activities. Teachers and learners review and collaborate how to give more choice as they learn and demonstrate evidence of learning.

Designer 

The learner chooses topics and direction for what they plan to design based on personal interests. They research topics based on questions generated individually or with peers. The learner acquires the skills they need to choose the appropriate tools and resources for developing and creating their design. Learners, individually or with peers, brainstorm and choose ideas using the design thinking process to create change or design new products:

1. Empathize is where they talk to people and reflect on what they see.
2. Define is where learners become aware of needs and how to make changes to meet needs.
3. Ideate is where learners brainstorm ideas and questions around changes.
4. Prototype can be a sketch or model that conveys the product or idea for change.
5. Test is to determine what works, what doesn’t work and then modifies the prototype.

The learner can be part of a pathways program that guides the design of their learning. They find an advisor or mentor who can guide them as they explore their interests, talents and passions to discover their purpose. They can choose extended learning opportunities such as internships or apprenticeship to take their aspirations to another level.

Advocate

The learner chooses a challenge or problem that they are passionate about. This is where the learner wants to make a difference and perseveres to choose what will be their purpose of learning. When they identify the challenge or problem they then own an authentic voice with a clear purpose for the choices they will make to advocate for what they believe. They employ strategies and build a network of others who want to solve the challenge or problem to advocate for change. The group works strategically to develop an action plan to shape the change. When the learner has the experiences of advocacy working toward something they believe in, they are using the power of democracy and understand their part in the system.

Entrepreneur
The learner self-regulates, adjusts, and determines learning based on what they want to do with their lives. They take their ideas and passion to pursue an idea and possibly to create a business. Even young learners may invent or come up with an idea that improves a product or invent something that has never been done before. This is the driving force that becomes their purpose. They take the lead by driving the design process and advocating for what they believe is an important product or idea. They build a support system as their personal learning network (PLN) that helps guide them on their journey to learn, build, design, create, develop, and promote an idea or product. The learner understands the importance of being connected, branding who they are and pursuing their purpose for learning. 

Reflections:

The Continuum of Choice is highly relevant to my own learning and thinking, not only by dint of the fact that it relates directly to my collaborative appraisal goal this year, but also because, as we know, motivation levels in children increase as those children are given a greater element of choice in what their play and learning relates to. My question is: how is this going to 'work' with children who are transitioning to school with fewer and fewer self-management skills?

DMIC observation 27 February 2019

Link to the DMIC plan which Lianna and Kelly observed today.
Reflection notes following the observation:

• practise the asking and answering of questions - be very explicit
• when modelling and acting out... don't go too far!
• use numbers beyond 10, e.g., instead of 3 bears and 2 buttons each, why not 7 bears and 2 buttons each?
• use of the modelling book: refer to it, keep it on display, and demonstrate, saying, "This is where it says..."
• you can make up or fake the 'Connecting' part of the lesson, e.g., "I saw a group next door who ... skip counted, for example."
• Launch: for the first couple of weeks, do be quite explicit with the questioning:

"Who is the story about?"

"What happens?"

"What do we need to find out?"

• Have the Talk Moves laminated and on display
• Keep any silent children in a group of 3 for now.

DMIC PD (Session 1)

Current challenges:

• We have a full NE class however they are yet to be assessed - is this a challenge or perhaps

not?!

• These children are coming to grips with being at school and are responding really well to play

situations, and many are just learning to follow instructions and focus for any length of time

Current successes:

• The children respond really well to stories especially stories in which they feature!

What are you doing now that you were not doing at the start of the year?

What are your students doing now that they were not doing at the start of the year?

Focus on justifying and arguing mathematically this year. One of the talk moves that we need
to focus on is wait time.

Encourage the use of ‘so if’, ‘then’ and ‘because’. Use revoicing more often.

So don’t say, e.g., what did you do next? Rather ‘then’.

Developing generalisations:

Looking for rules or relationships, eg, solving multiplication problem using repeated addition, and
another group has used multiplication. Or can you now multiply by 10s, 100s, 1000s?

Recognising and describing patterns and connections is when children are really starting to
generalise.

Remember to call a pause, at appropriate moments (e.g., right at the start when most groups
haven’t even figured out how to start). Call attention to a group which really knows what they’re
doing, and get them to describe how they actually started. You can even go to a group which
is way off track, and get them to start to explain and then say to them, “I disagree with that.”
And walk away.

Have a week of exploring, in advance of a theme (e.g., fractions). Have an area where they are
asked, e.g., how many ways can you show a half?

Warm up is not related to the problem - quite separate.

Status:

Look at the child as a whole rather than what stage they’re operating at?

What is assigned value?

As teachers, we need to raise the status of some students and lower the status of others  
(it’s not about upsetting that child).

The teacher isn’t just addressing the Maths.

Read BES on Maths.

BES exemplar 1: Developing Communities of Mathematical Inquiry

Read the reading about Complex Instruction.

Read the Jo Boaler article. It reinforces mulit-dimensional classrooms. They have complex
tasks for their students. They value effort over ability.

Select a goal (Teacher Practice) for feedback. The ones on the framework that are in bold
are suggested.

Lesson structure Juniors: timing

Warm up: 20 minutes (whole class - could be split)

Group norms/launch: 5-10 minutes

Paired problem solving: 5 minutes

Large group discussion: 5 minutes

Give next level, same context, different numbers

Paired problem solving: 5 minutes

Large group discussion: 5 minutes

Connect/Making connections to the big idea: 10 minutes

Teacher role: anticipate, monitor, select, sequence, connect.

Always give a context for the problem (cultural, in school - this raises status).